A real audit of an online store

Audited September 18, 2026. 120 pages analyzed, overall score 52/100. Only the names were changed.

These PDFs are samples of the audit report, not of the full delivery.

A full order includes three PDFs: the audit report, the page-by-page analysis and the methodology note.

The report's verdict

The storefront works without a single defect and ranks very well in search, but the site lags behind on compliance, accessibility, and security hardening, which exposes it more than a merchant of its size should be.

These passages are copied from the report, word for word.

What needs fixing

  • Compliance at 15/100: two clicks to reject cookies, an incomplete legal notice (3 fields missing), no consumer mediator, no accessibility statement, and customer reviews published with no information on how they are verified.
  • Accessibility at 28/100: zoom blocked on all 120 pages, unnamed buttons and links on more than 100 pages, and search and menus that do not work with a keyboard.
  • Security at 45/100: no browser protection headers, TLS 1.0 accepted, and one JavaScript library (axios 1.7.7) with 15 known high or critical vulnerabilities.
  • English, Spanish, and Italian versions served in French under a foreign-language label.
  • Mobile speed on a constrained network: 25 to 62 seconds to display the main content of listing pages and most product pages.

What already works

  • No functional defects on the 120 pages: zero script errors, zero missing resources, zero broken internal links out of 22,919 links followed.
  • SEO at 98/100: tags in place on all 120 pages, a declared sitemap, no redirect chains, and content served by the server.
  • User experience at 97/100: a clear first screen, visible commitments, a correct 404 error page, and no horizontal overflow at the measured widths.
  • Real-user experience on mobile in the green: main content displayed in 1.6 s at the 75th percentile, with a response time of 144 ms.